algorithm = \"a process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations...\" (Bing<\/em>)<\/pre>
Now when we talk about Christianity, we must first recognize that it was founded by Jews (similarly to the founding of Buddhism by Hindus). Let\u2019s start, then, with the Hebrew Scriptures (what Christians call the Old Testament<\/em>).<\/p>
\u201d Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant<\/span> with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah; not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; forasmuch as they broke My covenant, although I was a lord over them, saith the LORD. But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the LORD, I will put My law in their inward parts, and in their heart will I write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people; and they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying: \u2018Know the LORD\u2019; for they shall all know Me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD; for I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin will I remember no more.\u201d <\/p> Jeremiah 31:30-3<\/em>3 <\/cite><\/blockquote>
But let us quickly depart from the theological and religious aspects of all this, and try to keep to our previous course.<\/p>
I found an interesting paper which says the following: <\/p>
\u201cEpistemology is one\u2019s view or theory of knowledge, and as a discipline, it seeks to respond to the following kinds of questions. What is the nature, or what are the features of knowledge? What can we know? Are there things we cannot know? What are the sources of knowledge? How is knowledge justified? What are the limits in attempting to justify knowledge? And so on\u2026<\/p>
\u201c\u2026In accordance with the biblical view of humanity as a differentiated totality rather than as a being composed of body and soul, knowledge is an activity in which the whole person\u2014intellect, emotion, will\u2014participates. The heart and all its faculties as the defining element of a person are central to the knowing process as a totality.\u201d<\/p> \u201cWhat is Knowledge? Biblical\/Hebraic Epistemology\u201d (Dr. Davey Naugle, Dallas Baptist University) <\/cite><\/blockquote>
That seems to be right in line with Judaism\u2019s emphasis on the tzaddick <\/em>(see our earlier blogpost<\/a>). <\/p>
So, let us take it as a working theory<\/em> that Judaism is the base\u2013the \u201cfoundation\u201d upon which the \u201chouse\u201d of Christianity is built.<\/p>
working theory = \"A working theory is a theory<\/strong> in the works\/in the making: a theory that's being tested.\" (UsingEnglish.com<\/em>)<\/pre>
Let\u2019s take a look then, at comparisons between Old and New Testament ontologies.<\/p>
\u201c (Judaism) proclaims that there is only one God, whose name is Yahweh, and He is the creator and ruler of the universe. He revealed His law, the Torah, to the Jewish people (who were known as Hebrews at that time) and He chose them to be a light for all humanity.<\/a><\/li>
\u201c A very important concept in Judaism is that of the Messiah. Originally the Jews believed that God would send a powerful messenger (the Messiah) who would deliver Israel from her oppressors and usher in a reign of peace and prosperity. Today many Jews no longer hold to a personal messiah, but hope for a messianic age of justice and truth. For the Jews the coming of the Messiah or the messianic age still lies in the future.<\/a><\/li>
\u201c Christians also accept the (Hebrew Scriptures, though they call them the \u2018Old Testament\u2019) and all its teachings as inspired.<\/a><\/li>
\u201c Among the basic truths accepted by both faiths<\/strong> are the perfect creation of the world out of nothing by an infinite God, the entrance of sin into this world via the temptation of another transcendent being called Satan, the judgement of God on sin, and the necessity of atonement for sin<\/a>.<\/li>
\u201cIn Judaism this atonement is accomplished through sacrifices, prayer, righteous acts, and God\u2019s mercy<\/a>.<\/li>
\u201cChristianity has received from Judaism its basic understanding of God, his covenant relationship with His people, and assembling together for worship.<\/a><\/strong> There is a divine plan for history and it is moving toward a wonderful goal when Yahweh will be the King not only of the Jews but of all the earth. Separation from the corrupting influences of the pagan world is important, but Judaism is not a religion that focuses on a spiritual world somewhere down the road. Its focus is on this present world, where life is meant to be rich and full<\/a>.\u201d <\/li><\/ol>
Based on this, it seems that the Hebrew house might be thought of as being one story, while the Christian house might be thought of being a second-story addition to the house.<\/p>
But that seems like an over-simplification. New Testament ontology is different in several distinct ways.<\/em> To begin with, Christians not only believe that Jesus was the long-awaited Messiah (\u201cChristos\u201d <\/em>or \u201cChrist<\/em>\u201d in Greek) of Judaism. They believe that He was God Himself.<\/p>
Christ = anointed; (e.g., the 'Messiah')<\/pre>
\u201cI am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about (Jesus): I\u2019m ready to accept (Him) as a great moral teacher, but I don\u2019t accept his claim to be God. That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic \u2014 on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg \u2014 or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse.<\/span><\/strong> You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about his being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.\u201d <\/p><\/blockquote>
Another thing that Christians believe, is that Christ, after being crucified<\/em> by the Romans, was resurrected<\/em>\u2013that is raised from the dead<\/span><\/em>, and that He is no longer dead but alive, where He sits in a throne in heaven, at the right hand<\/em> of God.<\/p>
\u201d The LORD said to my Lord, Sit you at my right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool. \u201c<\/p>Psalm 110:1<\/cite><\/blockquote>
So, from an ontological point of view, heaven is like a throne room, where God sits as a King, and Jesus sits in a favored place\u2013like the \u201cright-hand man.\u201d<\/p>
This idea is actually corroborated throughout both the Old and New Testaments in several places:<\/p>
\u201cIn the year that King Uzziah died I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up; and the train of his robe filled the temple.\u201d <\/p>Isaiah 6:1<\/cite><\/blockquote>
\u201cI\u00a0watched till thrones were\u00a0put in place,
And\u00a0the Ancient of Days was seated\u2026<\/p>
A thousand thousands ministered to Him;
Ten thousand times ten thousand stood before Him.\u201d<\/p>Daniel 7:9-10<\/cite><\/blockquote>
\u201cAt once I was in the Spirit, and behold, a throne stood in heaven, with one seated on the throne.\u201d<\/p>Revelation 4:2<\/cite><\/blockquote>
So there is a God. But Jesus is also God. This is part of what Christians call the Trinity.<\/p>
Trinity = \"In Christian doctrine<\/a>, the unity of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit<\/a> as three persons in one Godhead.\" (Britannica.com<\/em>)<\/pre>
In the New Testament, we are told:<\/p>
\u201cEverything was created by Him (meaning Christ<\/em>), in heaven and on earth, the visible and the invisible\u2026\u201d<\/p>Colossians 1:16<\/cite><\/blockquote>
We are also told:<\/p>
\u201cIn the beginning was the Word (again referring to Christ), <\/em>and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning (God\u2019s right hand man?)<\/em>. All things were created through Him, and apart from Him not one thing was created\u2026\u201d<\/p>John 1:1-3<\/cite><\/blockquote>
So, as difficult as any of this may be to believe, these are the New Testament\u2019s propositions. <\/p>
\u201cEither this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse<\/strong>\u2026\u201d<\/p>C.S.Lewis<\/cite><\/blockquote><\/figure>
$\"\"$ C.S. Lewis<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>
I ran across something, though, by someone named John Stuart Mill, a critic of Christianity, whom the \u201cInternet Encyclopedia of Philosophy\u201d says<\/a>: \u201cprofoundly influenced the shape of nineteenth century British thought and political discourse\u2026 His substantial corpus of works includes texts in logic, epistemology, economics, social and political philosophy, ethics, metaphysics, religion, and current affairs.\u201d<\/p>
\u201cBut about the life and sayings of Jesus there is a stamp of personal originality combined with profundity of insight\u2026.in the very first rank of men of sublime genius of whom our species can boast. When this pre-eminent genius is combined with the qualities of probably the greatest moral reformer, and martyr to that mission, who ever existed upon earth, religion cannot be said to have made a bad choice in pitching on this man as the ideal representative and guide of humanity; nor, even now, would it be easy, even for an unbeliever, to find a better translation of the rule of virtue from the abstract into the concrete, than to endeavor so to live that Christ would approve our life.\u201d<\/p>John Stuart Mill<\/cite><\/blockquote>
$\"\"$
J.S. Mill<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>
So belief in Jesus Christ as the Jewish Messiah seems to be the apparent linchpin of Christianity\u2019s epistemological and ontological system of propositions.<\/p>
What about cosmology<\/em>?<\/p>
Well, here, my thinking was inspired by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , specifically their site called Cosmology and Theology<\/a><\/em>. There they raise an interesting idea:<\/p>
\u201cAccording to traditional Christian theism, creation\u00a0ex nihilo<\/em>\u00a0is miraculous\u2014something which the laws of nature cannot explain. But then why should a theist expect to be able to derive creation\u00a0ex nihilo<\/em>\u00a0from the laws of nature? Compare with other supposed miracles, e.g., within Christianity the claim that Jesus changed water into wine. Do Christian theists claim that chemistry should predict that water can transform into wine?\u201d\u00a0 <\/p>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
(Cosmology and Theology<\/em>)<\/cite><\/blockquote>
In this they refer to John 2:1-11, which records Jesus\u2019 first miracle<\/em>.<\/p>
miracle = \"an extraordinary event manifesting divine intervention in human affairs\" (Mirriam-Webster<\/em>)<\/pre>
The idea, then, is that Jesus created the wine with the appearance<\/em> and properties <\/em>of real<\/span><\/strong> wine, to such an extent that: <\/p>
\u201d When the master of the feast tasted the water now become wine, and did not know where it came from (though the servants who had drawn the water knew), the master of the feast called the bridegroom and said to him, \u2018Everyone serves the good wine first, and when people have drunk freely, then the poor wine. But you have kept the good wine until now.'\u201d <\/p>John 2:9-10<\/cite><\/blockquote>
So, this dude\u2013this \u201cmaster of the feast\u201d (the Maitre d\u2019<\/em>\u00a0?) tastes<\/span> the wine and (presumably based on the skills and experience that landed him the gig<\/span>) thinks the stuff is \u2018the good wine\u2019? <\/p>
Wait one moment\u2026 Let\u2019s pause here and think about this\u2026<\/p>
Is that suggesting a possibility that a guy like Charles Lyell might look at the striated layers of the geologic column, and (mistakenly) assume that it was laid down through natural processes over millions of years?<\/p>
And\u2026 so\u2026 may that also mean that a fellow like Charles Darwin (as sincere as he might have been) may have<\/span> <\/em>been mistaken, when in the Galapagos, Darwin first postulated the idea that animals and humans shared a common ancestry<\/a>.<\/p>
And\u2026 may that also imply that the Belgian priest named\u00a0Georges Lema\u00eetre<\/em>\u00a0may also have made an error when he first suggested the big bang theory in the 1920s<\/a>?<\/p>
\u201cIt is a mistake to confound strangeness with mystery.\u201d<\/em> <\/p>Sherlock Holmes (A Study in Scarlet)<\/em><\/cite><\/blockquote>
$\"\"$ Sherlock Holmes<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div><\/body>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cWe all want progress. But progress means getting nearer to the place where you want to be. And if you have taken a wrong turning, then to go forward does not get you any nearer. If you are on the wrong road, progress means doing an about turn and walking back to the right road; … Continue reading ““Mere” Christianity?”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education","category-worldview"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thinkingaccuratelyeducation.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6141"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thinkingaccuratelyeducation.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thinkingaccuratelyeducation.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thinkingaccuratelyeducation.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thinkingaccuratelyeducation.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6141"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/thinkingaccuratelyeducation.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6141\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6325,"href":"https:\/\/thinkingaccuratelyeducation.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6141\/revisions\/6325"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thinkingaccuratelyeducation.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thinkingaccuratelyeducation.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thinkingaccuratelyeducation.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}